Editorial Type: research-article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 11 Nov 2019

Ageing Northern Saw-whet Owls (Aegolius acadicus) from Remigial Molt Patterns

,
, and
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 387 – 392
DOI: 10.3356/0892-1016-53.4.387
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

We recorded molt patterns of migrant Northern Saw-whet Owls (Aegolius acadicus) at three locations in the Great Lakes region: Stevens Point, Wisconsin; Whitefish Point, Michigan; and Duluth, Minnesota. We then analyzed the molt patterns of recaptured birds that were banded in a previous season and originally classified as hatch-year birds (i.e., they had no remigial molt). Of these 286 known-age birds included in our analysis, 155 (54%) were second-year (SY), 72 (25%) were third-year (TY), 39 (14%) were fourth-year (4Y), 16 (6%) were fifth-year (5Y), three (1%) were sixth-year (6Y), and one (0.30%) was eighth-year (8Y). Using these known-age birds, we were able to identify definitive molt patterns for the SY and TY age classes. All 155 (100%) SY birds and 52 (72%) of the TY birds matched our ageing criteria. The remaining 28% of TY birds did not match our ageing criteria and were classified as after-second-year (ASY). Of the entire sample (n = 286), only three birds (1%) matched an incorrect age class, including one 4Y that matched the SY age class and two 5Y that matched the TY age class.

Resumen

Registramos los patrones de muda de individuos migratorios de Aegolius acadicus en tres localidades de la región de los Grandes Lagos: Stevens Point, Wisconsin, Whitefish Point, Michigan, y Duluth, Minnesota. Posteriormente, analizamos los patrones de muda de las aves recapturadas que fueron anilladas en una estación previa y clasificadas originalmente como aves del primer año calendario (i.e., que no mudaron las plumas remeras). De estas 286 aves de edad conocida e incluidas en nuestro análisis, 155 (54%) fueron del segundo año calendario (SA), 72 (25%) fueron del tercer año calendario (TA), 39 (14%) fueron del cuarto año calendario (4A), 16 (6%) fueron del quinto año calendario (5A), tres (1%) fueron del sexto año calendario (6A), y una (0.30%) fue del octavo año calendario (8A). Usando estas aves de edad conocida, fuimos capaces de identificar los patrones de muda definitivos para las clases de edad de SA y TA. Todas las aves SA de las 155 (100%) y 52 (72%) de las aves TA coincidieron con nuestro criterio de determinación de la edad. El restante 28% de las aves TA no coincidió con nuestro criterio de determinación de la edad y fueron clasificadas como posteriores al segundo año (PSA). Del total de la muestra (n = 286), solo tres aves (1%) coincidieron con una clase de edad incorrecta, incluyendo un ave de 4A que coincidió con la clase de edad de SA y dos de 5A que coincidieron con la clase de edad de TA.

[Traducción del equipo editorial]

Migrant Northern Saw-whet Owls (Aegolius acadicus) are common in much of the United States and Canada, with concentrations around the Great Lakes (Rasmussen et al. 2008). Adult and juvenile Northern Saw-whet Owls can be distinguished by the presence or absence of multiple generations of flight feathers (Evans and Rosenfield 1987, Pyle 1997a). Adult Northern Saw-whet Owls exhibit a pattern of remigial molt with up to three generations of feathers (Evans and Rosenfield 1987, Pyle 1997a). Remigial molt typically occurs from July to September, and is almost always incomplete (Evans and Rosenfield 1987, Slack 1992, Rasmussen et al. 2008). Therefore, we used molt patterns of known-age birds to determine the most prevalent molt pattern for different age classes.

Previous molt studies have been limited by both their small sample size and by their analysis of only one wing per bird, which can be misleading because molt is often asymmetrical in owls (Evans and Rosenfield 1987, Slack 1992). Although Evans and Rosenfield's findings have essentially been adopted and used in many studies, they have not been tested or modified to increase age-classification rates. Here we describe two basic molt patterns that can be used to distinguish SY and TY Northern Saw-whet Owls, and we quantify the effectiveness of these criteria to correctly age owls.

Methods

We pooled recapture data from three Midwestern banding stations: Linwood Springs Research Station in Wisconsin (44°28.233′N, 89°38.267′W), Whitefish Point Bird Observatory in Michigan (46°46.267′N, 84°57.250′W), and Hawk Ridge Bird Observatory in Minnesota (46°50.750′N, 92°2.000′W). Banders at all three stations captured Northern Saw-whet Owls during either fall or spring migration. Additionally, Whitefish Point Bird Observatory captured Northern Saw-whet Owls during the summer. All three stations used Northern Saw-whet Owl callers that broadcast the male “toot” call, which greatly increases capture rates (Erdman and Brinker 1997). Additionally, Whitefish Point Bird Observatory used a caller broadcasting a female “tssst” call (Neri et al. 2018). The Wisconsin site used data collected during netting operations from 1988 through 2013, the Michigan site from 1998 through 2013, and the Minnesota site from 1973 through 2008.

Owls were captured in mist-nets, banded, and measured according to each station's protocol. Banders recorded the molt patterns of both wings on every owl, due to possible variability between wings (Slack 1992). Only owls originally banded as HY birds and recaptured in a subsequent molt cycle, i.e., known-age owls, were used in this analysis. Banders determined molt patterns by looking at the dorsal side of the wing under incandescent or fluorescent lighting. Ultraviolet lighting on the ventral side of the wing (Weidensaul et al. 2011) was used only intermittently and as a secondary technique to verify patterns seen under normal lighting on the dorsal side. We classified feathers as new, old, and very old, referring to the three different generations that can be present in a given plumage. New flight feathers were the most recent generation, with the darkest color tones and showing the least amount of wear. Old flight feathers, which were 1 yr older than new feathers, had mid-range color tones due to fading and wear. Very old flight feathers (hereafter, VO), those 2 yr older than new feathers, exhibited the most color loss due to fading and showed the most wear. We abbreviate the primaries 1 through 10 as P1, P2, P3, etc., and secondaries 1 through 12 as S1, S2, S3, etc.

Results

Of the more than 50,000 Northern Saw-whet Owls banded in all years at the three stations, 722 were recaptured after at least one molt cycle (i.e., July and August) had occurred. Of those recaptured birds, only two (0.28%; 95% CI: 0.0–0.7%) showed a single generation of feathers on both wings. This indicates that birds with only one generation of remiges were >99% likely to be a hatch-year bird (HY). Of the 722 recaptured birds, 286 were initially banded while exhibiting no visible molt and were classified as HY. All others were omitted from our analysis of molt patterns. Of these 286, 155 (54%) were second-year birds (SY), 72 (25%) were third-year (TY), 39 (14%) were fourth-year (4Y), 16 (6%) were fifth-year (5Y), three (1%) were sixth-year (6Y), and one (0.3%) was eighth-year (8Y).

Second-year Molt Patterns. Of the 155 SY birds, 128 (83%) had the previously published (Evans and Rosefield 1987) SY molt pattern, which consists of a solid block of old feathers in the middle of at least one wing. However, we considered both wings and found that SY patterns can be more varied. Based on our observations, we established the following criteria. An SY pattern consists of a solid block of old feathers on both wings, with or without one skip on one or both wings (Fig. 1). A skip is defined as one new feather within a block of old feathers. This old feather block always includes at least S1 and P1 in both wings, and consists of at least three old feathers. It can be as small as P2–S1 or as large as P8–S10 and is not necessarily symmetrical between wings. One skip may be present in either the primaries or secondaries but not both, and no VO feathers are present. Pyle (1997b) suggested HY Northern Saw-whet Owls may have narrower outer primaries and more pointed center rectrices than adults, but we found no differences in the shape or pattern of juvenile and adult remiges. One hundred and fifty-six birds matched our criteria for the SY age class (Fig. 1), of which 155 were known SY (99.4%; 95% CI: 98.1–100.61%). One 4Y bird incorrectly fit our SY molt pattern criteria.

Figure 1.Figure 1.Figure 1.
Figure 1. Second-year molt pattern of fall migrant Northern Saw-whet Owls studied in the upper Midwest, USA. The molt pattern displayed in (a) is an exact match to the pattern in photo (b). The number of old remiges in the block can range from as few as three to as many as 18 old remiges, but most often this block consists of eight to twelve old remiges per wing. This diagram displays only one of many possible combinations (i.e., more or fewer old feathers) and the pattern may not be symmetrical between wings.

Citation: Journal of Raptor Research 53, 4; 10.3356/0892-1016-53.4.387

Third-year Molt Patterns. Evans and Rosenfield (1987) suggested a TY age class, but had a very small sample size. Based on Evans and Rosenfield's description of two outer blocks of old feathers on one wing, only seven birds from our sample fit into this class. With our much larger sample size and our examination of both wings, we found greater variation. Based on these observations, we established the following criteria. A TY pattern consists of two blocks of old feathers on the wing, with or without a VO block positioned discretely between the two old blocks. A block is defined as >1 feather and the pattern is not necessarily symmetrical between wings. Among the primaries, the old block of feathers never includes P1, P2 or P3. Among the secondaries, the old block of feathers never includes S1 or S2. If a VO block is present, there are no skips in that block and it is located at the center of the wing. This block is discrete and never includes feathers more distal than P4 or more proximal than S4. All old and VO blocks are discrete with new feathers in between. The number of remiges in each block can vary greatly among individuals in both SY and TY patterns. Of the 72 TY birds in our sample, 52 (72.2%; 95% CI: 61.9–82.6%) correctly matched our TY criteria, and 20 (28%) did not fit and were classified as ASY. From our sample of 286 total birds, 54 fit the criteria for the TY pattern; 52 of these were correctly classified as TY birds and the remaining two were 5Y birds (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.Figure 2.Figure 2.
Figure 2. Third-year (TY) molt pattern of fall migrant Northern Saw-whet Owls studied in the upper Midwest, USA. The TY pattern can vary in terms of which individual feathers are old and very old (VO), but the general pattern consists of two blocks of old feathers on the wing, with or without a VO block positioned discretely between the two old blocks. Molt patterns in diagram (a) and photo (b) are not identical, but both illustrate molt patterns that meet the criteria for this age classification. This figure displays only two of many possible combinations and the pattern may not be symmetrical between wings.

Citation: Journal of Raptor Research 53, 4; 10.3356/0892-1016-53.4.387

Discussion

It is unusual that a species the size of a Northern Saw-whet Owl goes through an incomplete adult prebasic molt. We found that feathers retained for two or three years were the most centrally located remiges on the wing. Because molting feathers requires a substantial amount of energy (Rohwer et al. 2009), we hypothesize those remiges receive the least amount of wear and not molting them as often allows the owl to conserve energy.

Other studies of molt in large raptors have used sequencing of specific flight feathers to determine age (Solheim 2012). However, in the genus Aegolius, we found that analyzing the overall pattern on both wings was more useful for ageing, due to the substantial individual variation in molt patterns.

Of the total sample of 286 known-age birds, 210 (73.4%) matched one of our two proposed molt patterns. Of those 210, 207 (98.6%) were correctly aged (Table 1). Given our large sample size, we are confident that our criteria for the SY and TY age classes are extremely accurate for ageing Northern Saw-whet Owls. Our TY criteria did fail to distinguish all the TY birds in our known-age sample; 20 of the 72 TY (27.7%) birds did not match this pattern and were classified as ASY. However, this pattern correctly assigned a TY age class to 52 of 54 (96.3%) birds in our sample. We caution that our TY criteria are accurate when a bird fits the pattern, but in our work they distinguished only 72 % of the TY birds and classified the remaining TY birds as ASY.

Table 1. Age classes assigned for all 286 Northern Saw-whet Owls using the criteria for each molt pattern. Age class abbreviations: SY, second-year; TY, third-year; 4Y, fourth-year; 5Y, fifth-year; 6Y, sixth-year; 8Y, eighth-year.
Table 1.

The fourth-year birds exhibited variable molt patterns, making it difficult to develop a reliable 4Y pattern. We found that 4Y molt patterns resembled the SY pattern, having a large block of old remiges in the center of the wing, but generally with new remiges at P1 or S1. We hypothesize that Northern Saw-whet Owls alternate between some versions of SY and TY patterns throughout the rest of their lives, with the patterns growing more variable as they age. Indeed, we did observe this in the few individuals that were recaptured in multiple years.

Acknowledgments

We thank the >150 banders who assisted with the banding operation at our three stations. Financial support was received from Duluth Audubon, Aldo Leopold Audubon, Raptor Services, UW-Stevens Point, Baillie Fund and Michigan Audubon. Financial support for color printing was received from Hawk Ridge Bird Observatory and Michigan Audubon. Permission to capture and band Northern Saw-whet Owls was obtained from the USGS Bird Banding Lab under federal permits 21132, 22238, 20583 and MI state permit 1343. We also thank C. Neri, J. Rothe, T. Ginnett, S. Weidensaul, D. Brinker, A. Lindsay, R. Brady, R. Steiner, J. Marks and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which greatly improved earlier versions of this report.

Literature Cited

  • Erdman, T., and BrinkerD. (1997). Increasing mist net captures of migrant Northern Saw-whet Owls (Aegolius acadicus) with an audiolure.InBiology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere; Second International Symposium ( DuncanJ. R.,JohnsonD. H., and NichollsT. H., Editors).
    Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-190. USDA Forest Service, North-central Forest Experiment Station
    ,
    St. Paul, MN, USA
    . pp. 553544.
  • Evans, D. L., and RosenfieldR. N. (1987). Remigial molt in fall migrant Long-eared and Northern Saw-whet Owls.InBiology and Conservation of Northern Forest Owls; symposium proceedings; 1987 February 3-7; Winnipeg, MB ( HamreR. W., Editor).
    Tech. Rep. RM-142. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station
    ,
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    . pp. 209214.
  • Neri, C., Mackentley N., Dykema Z. A., Bertucci E. M., and LindsayA. R. (2018). Different audio lures lead to different sex-biases in capture of Northern Saw-whet Owls (Aegolius acadius).Journal of Raptor Research52: 245249.
  • Pyle, P. (1997a). The Identification Guide to North American Birds, Part 1.
    Slate Creek Press
    ,
    Bolinas, CA, USA
    .
  • Pyle, P. (1997b). Flight-feather molt patterns and age in North American owls.Monographs in Field Ornithology, No. 2.
    American Birding Association
    ,
    Colorado Springs, CO, USA
    .
  • Rasmussen, J. L., Sealy S. G., and CanningsR. J. (2008). Northern Saw-whet Owl (Aegolius acadicus).The Birds of North America ( PooleA., Editor).
    Cornell Lab of Ornithology
    ,
    Ithaca, NY, USA
    . https://birdsna.org/Species-Account/bna/species/nswowl/introduction.
  • Rohwer, S., Ricklefs R. E., Rohwer V. G., and CoppleM. M. (2009). Allometry of the duration of flight feather molt in birds.PLoS Biology7: e1000132. doi:10.1371/ journal. pbio.1000132.
  • Slack, R. S. (1992). An unexpected sex-ratio in a sample of Northern Saw-whet Owls.North American Bird Bander17: 15.
  • Solheim, R. (2012). Wing feather moult and age determination of Snowy Owls Bubo scandiacus.Ornis Norvegica35: 4867.
  • Weidensaul, C. S., Colvin B. A., Brinker D. F., and HuyS. J. (2010). Use of ultraviolet light as an aid in age classification of owls.Wilson Journal of Ornithology123: 373377.
Copyright: © 2019 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. 2019
Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Second-year molt pattern of fall migrant Northern Saw-whet Owls studied in the upper Midwest, USA. The molt pattern displayed in (a) is an exact match to the pattern in photo (b). The number of old remiges in the block can range from as few as three to as many as 18 old remiges, but most often this block consists of eight to twelve old remiges per wing. This diagram displays only one of many possible combinations (i.e., more or fewer old feathers) and the pattern may not be symmetrical between wings.


Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Third-year (TY) molt pattern of fall migrant Northern Saw-whet Owls studied in the upper Midwest, USA. The TY pattern can vary in terms of which individual feathers are old and very old (VO), but the general pattern consists of two blocks of old feathers on the wing, with or without a VO block positioned discretely between the two old blocks. Molt patterns in diagram (a) and photo (b) are not identical, but both illustrate molt patterns that meet the criteria for this age classification. This figure displays only two of many possible combinations and the pattern may not be symmetrical between wings.


Contributor Notes

1 Email address: novamackentley@gmail.com

Associate Editor: Christopher J. Farmer

Received: 28 Nov 2018
Accepted: 16 Jul 2019
  • Download PDF