Editorial Type:
Article Category: Brief Report
 | 
Online Publication Date: 19 May 2020

Perch Management May Reduce Raptor Electrocution Risk on Horizontal Post Insulators

,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 186 – 192
DOI: 10.3356/0892-1016-54.2.186
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Raptor electrocutions on overhead power lines occur globally. To evaluate a mitigation strategy designed for horizontal post insulators, a common configuration in the 25–69-kV range, we quantified perching by two Great Horned Owls (Bubo virginianus) and seven Red-tailed Hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) on non-energized 25-kV and 69-kV horizontal post insulators installed below vertically mounted perch deterrents. We quantified how often and how long raptors perched on horizontal post insulators beneath perch deterrents, and how often and how long raptors simultaneously contacted both ends of horizontal post insulators, to simulate phase-to-ground electrical contacts. Across 900.0 min of video recordings, raptors usually perched at the distal end of the insulator away from the perch deterrent, but 56 of 1095 perches (5.1%) included at least some time perched below the perch deterrent (Σ = 34.0 min). We never observed any Great Horned Owls simultaneously contact both ends of an insulator. We observed three occurrences of Red-tailed Hawks simultaneously contacting both ends of an insulator (twice on the 25-kV insulator; once on the 69-kV insulator). We speculate that in the absence of the perch deterrents, raptors would have perched toward the center of horizontal post insulators with higher frequency, resulting in a greater frequency of bridging both ends of horizontal post insulators. On energized poles, such behavior would increase electrocution risk. This suggests that perch deterrents may reduce raptor electrocution risk on vertically configured power poles. This study should be repeated with a design that evaluates perching on horizontal post insulators with and without perch deterrents, with larger sample sizes, and with additional raptor species, particularly Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos).

Resumen

La electrocución de rapaces en líneas eléctricas aéreas ocurre globalmente. Para evaluar una estrategia de mitigación diseñada para aisladores horizontales, una configuración común en el rango de 25–69 kV, cuantificamos el comportamiento de dos individuos de Bubo virginianus y de siete individuos de Buteo jamaicensis al posarse en aisladores horizontales no energizados de 25 kV y 69 kV instalados debajo de inhibidores de posado montados verticalmente. Cuantificamos la frecuencia y el tiempo que estas rapaces se posaron sobre los aisladores horizontales debajo de los inhibidores de posado. También cuantificamos la frecuencia y el tiempo que contactaron simultáneamente ambos extremos de los aisladores horizontales para simular contactos eléctricos de fase a tierra. A lo largo de 900.0 min de grabaciones de vídeo, las rapaces se posaron habitualmente en el extremo distal del aislador, alejadas del inhibidor de posado, pero 56 de las 1095 observaciones (5.1%) incluyeron al menos algún tiempo posadas debajo del inhibidor de posado (Σ = 34.0 min). Nunca observamos ningún individuo de B. virginianus contactar simultáneamente ambos extremos de un aislador. Observamos tres casos de B. jamaicensis contactando simultáneamente ambos extremos de un aislador (dos veces en el aislador de 25 kV; una vez en el aislador de 69 kV). Especulamos que, en ausencia de los inhibidores de posado, las rapaces se hubieran posado con mayor frecuencia hacia el centro de los aisladores horizontales, resultando en una mayor frecuencia de puenteo de ambos extremos de los aisladores horizontales. En los postes energizados, este comportamiento aumentaría el riesgo de electrocución. Esto sugiere que los inhibidores de posado pueden reducir el riesgo de electrocución de las rapaces en los postes de energía configurados verticalmente. Este estudio debería ser repetido con un diseño que evalúe el posarse sobre aisladores horizontales con y sin inhibidores de posado, con mayores tamaños de muestreo, y con especies de rapaces adicionales, particularmente de Aquila chrysaetos.

[Traducción del equipo editorial]

Copyright: © 2020 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. 2020
Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Examples of Red-tailed Hawks perched on armless configurations. (A) A Red-tailed Hawk perched on a horizontal post insulator; second Red-tailed Hawk perched at the top of the pole. (B) A Red-tailed Hawk perched on a strain insulator. (C) A Red-tailed Hawk perched on a horizontal post insulator bracket. Due to the lengths of the insulators in these photographs, only the Red-tailed Hawk in image C is at risk of electrocution on these configurations.


Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Overall length and insulator length of horizontal post insulators (not drawn to scale). The lower end of the perch deterrent on the 25-kV insulator bends toward the pole as required to maintain the minimum clearance required around the energized end of the insulator.


Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Raptor perch locations on horizontal post insulators relative to perch deterrents intended to prevent simulated simultaneous contact with energized and grounded ends of the insulators. (A and B) perching beyond the perch deterrent. (C and D) perching under the perch deterrent. (E and F) contacting both ends of the horizontal post insulator. (A, C, and E) 25-kV horizontal post insulator. (B, D, and F) 69-kV horizontal post insulator.


Contributor Notes

1 Email address: jdwyer@edmlink.com

Associate Editor: Steven J. Slater

Received: 18 Mar 2019
Accepted: 04 Mar 2019
  • Download PDF